Strickland suggested postponing the final year of the overall 21 percent tax cut, raising about $850 million. The cuts were scheduled to be phased in over five years at a rate of 4.2 percent a year.

The governor, who pushed this year for an overhaul in school funding and curriculum, said leaders face three choices: raising taxes, cutting education funding or postponing the final year of income-tax reductions.
     
"I am more convinced than ever that Ohioans understand the link between education and job creation," Strickland said. "Underfunding education at this critical time would undermine our ability to position our state for growth after the economy recovers. It would also be devastating for our schools in the near term."

Strickland said that in postponing the income-tax reduction, Ohioans will only pay more in the 2009 and 2010 tax years than the 2008 tax year if they earned more money. Otherwise, Ohioans will see no change - and most will actually see a slight decrease because the amount that can be claimed as a personal exemption has grown, he said.
     
The governor's request must be approved by the state Legislature, where the House is controlled by follow Democrats and the Senate is controlled by Republicans. Strickland did not request that lawmakers act on his proposal within a certain amount of time, but said "the sooner the better."
     
Strickland said he plans to move forward on the final 4.2 percent reduction once the current budget's troubles are alleviated.
     
Last week, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that the slot machine proposal Strickland first turned to during the budget pinch is subject to voter approval. Strickland, who reversed himself on expanding gambling to propose the slots plan, had been counting on it contribute about $850 million to help balance the two-year education budget.
     
Strickland said the court's decision made it impossible for the slots revenue to contribute to the current-two year budget. The plan also faces two additional lawsuits questioning the constitutionality of expanding the Ohio Lottery to include slot.
    
Strickland said he will seek a declaratory judgment from the Ohio Supreme Court on whether the slots plan is legal. If it is, Strickland said he would consider going forward with it in the future but not soon enough to raise money for the current budget.
     
The governor's political opponents are likely to hammer him for what, in their view, is a tax increase proposal he announced Wednesday. The move was characterized as a tax increase before the governor's news conference announcing it had even concluded.
     
State Rep. Jay Hottinger, a Republican from Newark, said in a statement he was grateful the Democratic governor had started the debate on filling the hole created by the slots.
     
"However, Governor Strickland has consistently maintained that raising taxes in a poor economy is a bad idea that will likely delay the economic recovery of Ohio. Now he has changed his mind," Hottinger said. "I think he was right the first time."
     
Strickland said putting off tax cuts for two years is not a tax increase, but the avoidance of one.

"Now, of course, some will try to score political points by branding this delay as a tax increase," Strickland said."Contrary to what some may think I don't spend most of my life thinking about an election and what my opponents may or may not say about me."
     
The initial tax cuts were part of a package of tax reforms proposed by former Gov. Bob Taft, a Republican, in 2005 and enacted as part of a larger package of tax law changes intended to make Ohio more competitive.

Watch ONN-TV and ONNtv.com for the latest information.

©2009 by The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.